Ivar Vargas Belizario is postdoctoral researcher (2021-2025) at University of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Is Ph.D. (2021) and M.Sc. (2012) in Computer Science at the University of Sao Paulo, Brazil. He obtained a Bachelor's degree in Computer Science (2020) through revalidation from the Federal University of São Carlos, Brazil. Has experience in Computer Science, with emphasis on Image Analysis and Processing, Image Segmentation, Feature Extraction, Data Science, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Information Visualization and Graphs/Complex Networks. Ramos, Jonathan S. and de Aguiar, Erikson J. and Belizario, Ivar V. and Costa, Márcus V. L. and Maciel, Jamilly G. and Cazzolato, Mirela T. and Traina, Caetano and Nogueira-Barbosa, Marcello H. and Traina, Agma J. M. 2022 IEEE 35th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS). [bibtex] [doi: 10.1049/ipr2.12242] @INPROCEEDINGS{9867008, author={Ramos, Jonathan S. and de Aguiar, Erikson J. and Belizario, Ivar V. and Costa, Márcus V. L. and Maciel, Jamilly G. and Cazzolato, Mirela T. and Traina, Caetano and Nogueira-Barbosa, Marcello H. and Traina, Agma J. M.}, booktitle={2022 IEEE 35th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)}, title={Analysis of vertebrae without fracture on spine MRI to assess bone fragility: A Comparison of Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning}, year={2022}, volume={}, number={}, pages={78-83}, keywords={Deep learning;Support vector machines;Osteoporosis;Sensitivity; Databases;Magnetic resonance imaging;Magnetic resonance; Magnetic resonance imaging;machine learning;deep learning; vertebral fragility fractures;texture analysis}, doi={10.1109/CBMS55023.2022.00021}, abstract = {Bone mineral density (BMD) is the international standard for evaluating osteoporosis/osteopenia. The success rate of BMD alone in estimating the risk of vertebral fragility fracture (VFF) is approximately 50%, making BMD far from ideal in predicting VFF. In addition, whether or not a patient has been diagnosed with osteoporosis or osteopenia, he or she may suffer a VFF. For this reason, we conducted an extensive empirical study to assess VFFs in postmenopausal women. We considered a representative dataset of 94 T1- and T2-weighted routine spine MRI (with osteopenia or osteoporosis), split into 2,400 samples (slices). Comparing the classification results of machine learning and deep learning (DL) techniques showed that DL generally achieved better results at the cost of higher computational power and hard explainability. ResNet achieved the best results in discriminating patients from groups with and without VFFs with 83% accuracy and 90% AUC (with a confidence interval of 99%). Our results represent a significant step toward prospective and longitudinal studies investigating methods to achieve higher accuracy in predicting VFFs based on spine MRI features of vertebrae without fracture.} } Ivar Vargas Belizario, Oscar Cuadros Linares, João do Espirito Santo Batista Neto IET Image Processing, Volume 15, Issue 11, September 2021. [bibtex] [doi: 10.1049/ipr2.12242] @article{https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.12242, author = {Belizario, Ivar Vargas and Linares, Oscar Cuadros and Neto, João do Espirito Santo Batista}, title = {Automatic image segmentation based on label propagation}, journal = {IET Image Processing}, volume = {15}, number = {11}, pages = {2532-2547}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.12242}, url = {https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1049/ipr2.12242}, eprint = {https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1049/ipr2.12242}, abstract = {Abstract This article introduces an automatic approach for the segmentation of coloured natural scene images based on graphs and the propagation of labels originally designed for communities detection in complex networks. Images are initially pre-segmented with super-pixels, followed by feature extraction using colour information of each super-pixels. The resulting graph consists of vertices which represent super-pixels, whereas the edge weights are a measure of similarity between super-pixels. The resulting segmentation corresponds to the propagation of labels among the vertices. In this article, three strategies for propagating labels have been formulated: (i) iterative propagation (ILP), (ii) recursive propagation (RLP) and (iii) a weighted recursive propagation (WRLP). The experiments have shown that the proposed methods, when compared to other state-of-the-art methods, produce better results in terms of segmentation quality and processing time.}, year = {2021} } Rosane Minghim 1, Liz Huancapaza, Erasmo Artur, Guilherme P. Telles, Ivar V. Belizario Algorithms, Graph Drawing and Information Visualization, Volume 13, Issue 11, November 2020 [bibtex] [doi: 10.3390/a13110302] @Article{rosane2020, AUTHOR = {Minghim, Rosane and Huancapaza, Liz and Artur, Erasmo and Telles, Guilherme P. and Belizario, Ivar V.}, TITLE = {Graphs from Features: Tree-Based Graph Layout for Feature Analysis}, JOURNAL = {Algorithms}, VOLUME = {13}, YEAR = {2020}, NUMBER = {11}, ARTICLE-NUMBER = {302}, URL = {https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/13/11/302}, ISSN = {1999-4893}, ABSTRACT = {Feature Analysis has become a very critical task in data analysis and visualization. Graph structures are very flexible in terms of representation and may encode important information on features but are challenging in regards to layout being adequate for analysis tasks. In this study, we propose and develop similarity-based graph layouts with the purpose of locating relevant patterns in sets of features, thus supporting feature analysis and selection. We apply a tree layout in the first step of the strategy, to accomplish node placement and overview based on feature similarity. By drawing the remainder of the graph edges on demand, further grouping and relationships among features are revealed. We evaluate those groups and relationships in terms of their effectiveness in exploring feature sets for data analysis. Correlation of features with a target categorical attribute and feature ranking are added to support the task. Multidimensional projections are employed to plot the dataset based on selected attributes to reveal the effectiveness of the feature set. Our results have shown that the tree-graph layout framework allows for a number of observations that are very important in user-centric feature selection, and not easy to observe by any other available tool. They provide a way of finding relevant and irrelevant features, spurious sets of noisy features, groups of similar features, and opposite features, all of which are essential tasks in different scenarios of data analysis. Case studies in application areas centered on documents, images and sound data demonstrate the ability of the framework to quickly reach a satisfactory compact representation from a larger feature set.}, DOI = {10.3390/a13110302} } Ivar Vargas Belizario, Joao Batista Neto 33rd SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI), November 2020 [bibtex] [doi: 10.1109/SIBGRAPI51738.2020.00034] @INPROCEEDINGS{9265998, author={Belizario, Ivar Vargas and Neto, Joao Batista}, booktitle={2020 33rd SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI)}, title={Multi-level Graph Label Propagation for Image Segmentation}, year={2020}, volume={}, number={}, pages={195-202}, abstract = { This article introduces a multi-level automatic image segmentation method based on graphs and Label Propagation (LP), originally proposed for the detection of communities in complex networks, namely MGLP. To reduce the number of graph nodes, a super-pixel strategy is employed, followed by the computation of color descriptors. Segmentation is achieved by a deterministic propagation of vertex labels at each level. Several experiments with real color images of the BSDS500 dataset were performed to evaluate the method. Our method outperforms related strategies in terms of segmentation quality and processing time. Considering the Covering metric for image segmentation quality, for example, MGLP outperforms LPCI-SP, its most similar counterpart, in 38.99%. In term of processing times, MGLP is 1.07 faster than LPCI-SP.} doi={10.1109/SIBGRAPI51738.2020.00034}}
ivargasbelizario at gmail dot com |